# Incentivize small investments and voting

**URL:** <https://gov.pareto.credit/t/incentivize-small-investments-and-voting/66>\
**Category:** 💡 Ideas & Improvements\
**Created:** [November 28, 2020, 12:51am UTC](https://gov.pareto.credit/t/incentivize-small-investments-and-voting/66 "2020-11-28T00:51:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johndoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/65b543/32.png) [@johndoe](https://gov.pareto.credit/u/johndoe)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2020, 1:50am UTC](https://gov.pareto.credit/t/incentivize-small-investments-and-voting/66/6 "2020-11-28T01:50:28Z")

</div>

I always consider malicious/mad man attack when discussing about incentive system.

> 1. Incentivize the cost of gas for all those investments below $ 1000

In that case, I can easily divide my wallets below $1000 to avoid gas fee. Since Idle is non-custodial platform, I don’t think there’s any practical method to prevent this behavior.

> 1. Incentivize the cost of gas for Governance votes.

I can agree on that. I’m not sure about HOW to enforce off-chain’s decision to on-chain wallets but AFAIK, we have [3 diffent fund](https://gov.pareto.credit/t/idle-launch-now-the-hard-work-begins/49/5) for community usage. I think FeeTreasury fund and Ecosystem fund can be use to incentivize governance voting. (=paying gas fee) LTLP Fund is already hardcoded for its usage, and I prefer LTLP stay as it is.

and again… this can be sybil attacked too. I can divide my $IDLE to 0.01 per wallet and vote to deplete funds… 😅 So if we decide to paying voter’s gas fee, we might need some kind of batch transaction to prevent sybil attack. It can also cut down the expense of paying gas fee!

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.pareto.credit/t/incentivize-small-investments-and-voting/66)._