Thanks @8bitporkchop for this update and everyone for participating in the conversation.
This Temperature Check witnessed an impressive participation from $IDLE holders! More than 200k tokens have been used to cast a preference for this poll, resulting in a +680% increase compared to the previous one. Congrats guys!
To move forward with this peer-review, we will release a new post where we’ll point out all the resources to review the code and the requirements for the review. Developers that will contribute to this peer-review will be rewarded.
@william and @gravityblast will independently review the code, and we are glad to collaborate with @endymionjkb from Balancer (thanks @Fernando for your contribution, it’s a pity to hear re multisig signer but I understand the legal implication).
The ideal path would be to have a couple of developers from the DeFi community to enrich the peer-review’s quality.
@unicorn I like your idea of having a committee being the 3rd signer for the multisig as it would be in line with the committee model we proposed. How about if the perspective Treasury Committee will be the signer? Sounds like a natural application for it, but I’m wondering if we have too much “control concentration” in that committee in this way.